Skip to Content
We Will Travel to You | Available 24/7 - Phone & Video Consultations | Office in Weymouth, MA
Start Your Free Consultation Now 781-332-4344
Top

Case Results

  • Assault & Battery Charges Dismissed CWOF on Resisting Arrest & Disorderly – Assault & Battery Charges Dismissed

    Court: Brockton District Court

    Charges: Assault & Battery (2 counts), Resisting Arrest, Disorderly Conduct, Disturbing the Peace

    Our client faced multiple charges stemming from a late-night encounter outside a bar, including allegations of assaulting a patron, resisting arrest, and engaging in disorderly conduct. The defense challenged the credibility of the allegations and emphasized that the civilian witness initiated the physical contact. There were no injuries, no body camera footage, and no medical documentation, weakening the Commonwealth’s case. At a probable disposition hearing, the defense successfully negotiated a dismissal of both Assault & Battery charges.

    The case was resolved with a Continuance Without a Finding (CWOF) on the remaining charges of Resisting Arrest and Disorderly Conduct.

  • Not Guilty on Assault & Battery Charges Not Guilty on Assault & Battery Charges – Juvenile Probation Imposed

    Court: Quincy District Court (Juvenile Session)

    Charges: Assault and Battery (Two Separate Counts)

    Our client, a juvenile, was charged in connection with a serious group altercation that resulted in multiple Assault and Battery allegations. The Commonwealth relied heavily on video evidence and sought to portray the incident as a coordinated attack involving several youths. The defense conducted a detailed review of the police reports, video footage, and witness statements, carefully distinguishing our client’s conduct from that of other individuals involved. Through strategic advocacy and case preparation, the defense successfully avoided convictions on both Assault and Battery charges, securing Not Guilty findings. While the court imposed juvenile probation until the client reached the age of 18, no criminal convictions entered, preserving the client’s future and preventing the long-term consequences associated with violent offense convictions.

    This outcome reflects the importance of experienced juvenile defense representation, careful analysis of video evidence, and aggressive protection of a young client’s record in serious assault cases.

  • CWOF Entered – Stoughton District Court CWOF Entered – Stoughton District Court

    Court: Stoughton District Court

    Charges: Insurance Fraud, Attempted Larceny

    The client faced criminal charges alleging submission of false documents tied to a property insurance claim. The case involved disputed service invoices and financial records that led to a formal complaint and court proceedings. After multiple hearings and strategic defense negotiations, the client received a Continuance Without a Finding (CWOF). No restitution was ordered, and the case is scheduled to be dismissed after the CWOF period, provided there are no new arrests or charges.

    This outcome avoided a conviction and resolved the matter without penalties or admission of guilt.

  • Not Guilty on OUI – Plymouth District Court Not Guilty on all charges

    Court: Plymouth District Court

    Charges: OUI 2nd Offense, Negligent Operation, Marked Lanes

    Our client received a criminal complaint and summons for OUI after a state trooper claimed he was swerving and refused field sobriety tests. At trial, we challenged the Commonwealth’s case using police body camera footage, which showed no visible impairment and no sobriety tests conducted. The client remained calm and even asked for a breath test, which police couldn’t provide. The officer also searched the vehicle without consent, but no charges were filed for anything found — a key sign of legal overreach.

    Result: Not Guilty on all charges. This case highlights the importance of video review, strategic defense, and knowing your rights in OUI and criminal complaint cases.

  • Not Guilty on all counts Not Guilty on All Charges

    Court: Quincy District Court

    Charges: OUI-Liquor, Negligent Operation of a Motor Vehicle, Marked Lanes Violation

    Our client was arrested following a motor vehicle accident involving a median crossing. The Commonwealth alleged Operating Under the Influence and Negligent Operation based on witness statements and refusal to perform field sobriety tests. At a bench trial, the defense emphasized key body camera footage, conflicting officer narratives, and the client’s consistent denial of alcohol use. The footage showed no observable impairment, no field sobriety tests completed, and the arresting officers making conclusory statements without performing proper roadside evaluation.

    The court found the client Not Guilty on all counts, citing insufficient evidence of impairment. This case underscores the importance of aggressive DUI defense, cross-examination of police conduct, and careful review of video evidence in OUI trials.

  • Not Guilty on All Charges Not Guilty finding on all charges

    Court: Wareham District Court

    Charges: Indecent Assault and Battery on a Person Over 14

    Our client was charged with Indecent Assault and Battery following allegations of non-consensual sexual contact. The defense conducted a thorough pretrial investigation and was fully prepared to proceed to trial, with a strategy focused on surveillance video evidence and inconsistencies in the Commonwealth’s case. The evidence undermined the allegations and raised significant credibility issues, including contradictions between the complainant’s statements and objective video footage. As a result, the case concluded with a Not Guilty finding on all charges, fully clearing the client’s record.

    This result reflects the value of experienced Massachusetts criminal defense representation and careful preparation in defending against serious sexual assault allegations.

  • Not Guilty on OUI Not Guilty on OUI – CWOF on Negligent Operation

    Court: Plymouth District Court

    Charges: OUI Liquor, Negligent Operation of a Motor Vehicle, Marked Lanes Violation

    Our client was charged with Operating Under the Influence (OUI) and Negligent Operation after being stopped for a marked lanes violation. At a bench trial, the defense focused on body camera footage that showed no field sobriety tests were conducted and the arrest occurred within seconds of initial contact. The client's demeanor was calm and cooperative, with no visible signs of impairment. The judge found the client Not Guilty of OUI.

    The Negligent Operation charge was resolved with a Continuance Without a Finding (CWOF) — avoiding a conviction and protecting the client’s driving record. 

  • Not Guilty – Insurance Fraud Charges Dismissed Not Guilty – Insurance Fraud Charges Dismissed at Clerk Magistrate

    Court: BMC South Boston

    Charges: Attempted False Insurance Claim; Attempted Larceny

    Location of Alleged Incident: East 1st Street, South

    Boston Our client was accused of filing a fraudulent motor vehicle insurance claim with Plymouth Rock Assurance. The case relied on damage analysis and insurer conclusions, despite no insurance payout ever being issued. At the clerk magistrate hearing, the defense argued there was no probable cause, no false documents submitted, and no evidence of criminal intent. The court agreed and dismissed the application in full.

    This outcome preserved the client’s clean record and prevented the case from advancing to formal criminal charges.

  • Not Guilty ruling—case dismissed Not Guilty – Insurance Fraud Charge Dismissed After Clerk Hearing

    Court: BMC West Roxbury

    Charge: Attempted False Insurance Claim (G.L. c. 266, §111A)

    Location of Alleged Incident: Wood Ave., Hyde Park

    Our client was accused of filing a fraudulent claim with Plymouth Rock Assurance, alleging her vehicle was struck while parked on Wood Ave. The Insurance Fraud Bureau and Boston Police (E-18) cited inconsistencies based on damage analysis. At the BMC West Roxbury magistrate hearing, the defense argued there was no payout, no false documents, and no clear intent to defraud. The court found no probable cause and issued a Not Guilty ruling—case dismissed at the application stage.

    This result preserved the client’s clean record and avoided formal criminal charges.

1 / 8